This investigation relates p-values to likelihood ratios in Bernoulli trials, suggesting important constraints on hypothesis testing.
It is well known that there is no direct one-to-one relation between p-values and likelihood ratios or Bayes factors, since their relation crucially involves the sample size n. We investigate their (asymptotic) relation in a coin-tossing context where the hypotheses of interest address the success probability of the coin, and where detailed computations are possible. This leads to useful insights in the nature of p-values and likelihood ratios. Our results imply, for instance, that under mild conditions, a p-value of 0.05 cannot correspond to a likelihood ratio larger than 7.5, for any hypothesis versus a null hypothesis that the success probability has a specific value. We also show it is unlikely one can obtain a large likelihood ratio by tossing a fair coin until the number of heads deviates from the mean by several standard deviations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kager et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: