Global Burden of Disease study reports mortality and disability trends of aortic aneurysm, indicating varied health system impacts.
Background and Aims Aortic aneurysm (AA) is a potentially fatal aortic disorder, particularly when complicated by rupture. Using Global Burden of Disease 2021 estimates, this study reported worldwide changes in AA mortality, disability‐adjusted life years (DALYs), and modeled risk‐attributable burden from 1990 to 2021. Methods We reported Global Burden of Disease 2021 estimates and summarized findings using counts, percentages, and age‐standardized rates. Results In 2021, the global age‐standardized death rate for AA was 1.9 per 100,000, representing a 26.7% decrease since 1990. The global age‐standardized DALY rate was 36.5 per 100,000, reflecting a 25.1% reduction. The highest national DALY rates per 100,000 were estimated in Armenia (192.8), Montenegro (178.9), and Nauru (114.5), while the lowest were in Saudi Arabia (5.1), Tajikistan (5.7), and Sri Lanka (6.7). The largest increases in age‐standardized DALY rates occurred in Georgia (357.4%), Uzbekistan (320.6%), and Sudan (209.4%), whereas the greatest decreases occurred in Australia (−70.6%), Bermuda (−66.6%), and Canada (−65.9%). For both sexes, DALY rates were highest in the 95+ years group, indicating concentration of fatal burden at advanced age. Smoking, high systolic blood pressure, and high body mass index were the leading modeled contributors to global AA DALYs, accounting for 37.3%, 17.1%, and 8.0%, respectively. Conclusion This report identified marked variation in AA burden, potentially related to differences in screening, diagnosis, treatment access, and broader health‐system capacity. The results support targeted prevention, risk‐factor control, and improved vascular care, especially in resource‐limited settings. Reducing smoking and high systolic blood pressure may help lessen the future AA burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Safiri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: