PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 6, 2026ERJ Open Research1 citationsOpen Access

Low End-Tidal CO 2 Identifies High-Severity Pulmonary Embolism and Shock-Level Hemodynamics

View Full Paper
LGLee GreensponPHPatrick HoJGJason George

Key Result

End-tidal CO2 was significantly lower in patients with higher-risk pulmonary embolism compared to lower-risk patients (21.7 vs 30.2 mmHg; P<0.001), serving as a non-invasive marker of severity.

Key Points

  • This study aims to determine if early End-Tidal CO2 measurement reflects the severity of pulmonary embolism and identifies shock-level hemodynamics.
  • Participants included patients with acute pulmonary embolism confirmed by computed tomography.
  • End-Tidal CO2 was measured using nasal capnography within 24 hours of presentation or prior to urgent catheter directed therapy.
  • Pulmonary artery pressures and cardiac index were recorded in patients undergoing catheter directed therapy.
  • End-Tidal CO2 was significantly lower in the higher-risk group at 21.7 mmHg compared to 30.2 mmHg in the lower-risk group (p<0.001).
  • Patients referred for catheter directed therapy had lower End-Tidal CO2 levels at 20.4 mmHg versus 28.2 mmHg (p<0.001).
  • Among patients with cardiogenic shock, End-Tidal CO2 was the lowest at 18.6 mmHg.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=62)

Structured PICO

Does early End-Tidal CO2 measurement reflect pulmonary embolism severity and identify shock-level hemodynamics?

P
Population
62 patients admitted with acute pulmonary embolism confirmed by computed tomography pulmonary angiogram.
E
Exposure
End-Tidal CO2 (EtCO2) measurement using nasal capnography within 24 h of presentation or immediately prior to urgent catheter-directed therapy (CDT)
C
Comparator
Lower severity PE groups vs higher severity PE groups (ESC risk categories); patients referred for CDT vs not referred
O
Outcome
EtCO2 levels compared between lower and higher severity PE groups, and between patients referred for CDT or notsurrogate

Early non-invasive measurement of EtCO2 reflects ESC-defined pulmonary embolism severity and identifies shock-level hemodynamics in patients undergoing catheter-directed therapy.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 21.7% vs 30.2%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

Objective End-Tidal CO 2 (EtCO 2 ) may be reduced when lung units are ventilated but under-perfused, as occurs in Pulmonary Embolism (PE). We sought to determine whether early EtCO 2 measurement reflects PE severity according to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) risk categories and identifies shock level hemodynamics among patients undergoing catheter directed therapy (CDT). Methods Patients admitted with acute PE confirmed by computed tomography pulmonary angiogram were enrolled in this prospective observational study. EtCO 2 was measured using nasal capnography within 24 h of presentation or immediately prior to urgent CDT. EtCO 2 was compared between lower and higher severity PE groups and between patients referred for CDT or not. In patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy(CDT) with invasive hemodynamic assessment, pulmonary artery pressures and Cardiac Index were recorded. A subgroup analysis evaluated patients with cardiogenic shock defined as a cardiac index <1.8 L/min·m −2 . Results Sixty-two patients were analyzed. EtCO 2 was significantly lower in the combined Higher-risk group compared with the combined lower-risk group (21.7 mmHg 95%CI (20.2–23.3) versus 30.2 mmHg 95%CI (27.8–32.6) p<0.001). EtCO 2 was also lower in patients referred for CDT compared to those not referred (20.4 mmHg 95%CI (18.7–22.0) versus 28.2 mmHg 95%CI (26.2–30.1), p<0.001). Among patients who underwent CDT and met hemodynamic criteria for cardiogenic shock (n=16), EtCO 2 was the lowest (18.6 mmHg (16.1–21.1). Conclusions EtCO 2 can be rapidly obtained early in PE evaluation and reflects ESC-defined severity. An EtCO 2 level< 20 mmHg was associated with shock level hemodynamics among normotensive Intermediate-high-risk patients undergoing CDT. EtCO 2 may serve as a non-invasive marker of physiologic severity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Greenspon et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute Pulmonary Embolism (n=62). Higher-risk pulmonary embolism vs. Lower-risk pulmonary embolism was evaluated on End-Tidal CO2 (EtCO2) level (p=<0.001). End-tidal CO2 was significantly lower in patients with higher-risk pulmonary embolism compared to lower-risk patients (21.7 vs 30.2 mmHg; P<0.001), serving as a non-invasive marker of severity.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a23bbeb71a5da9775e77595https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00062-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper