Retrospective study reports satisfaction and complications of Rigicon AX in 100 patients, suggesting effectiveness compared to other brands.
Introduction Penile implant are gold standard treatment for E.D. when no other medical treatment is saysfactory. We present the first 100 cases performed in a Center of Excellence for penile implant surgery with the latest implant available in the market: rigicon infla10ax. Objective To present our experience with the first 70 cases of the Rigicon AX penile prosthesis and compare the statistics to the other implants avalible in the market. Methods Retrospective study of patients implanted in the last 4 years with this prosthesis, presenting statistics on satisfaction (edits) and complication rate and comparing them to the first 100 implants of the other two available brands. Results 100 cases with a minimum follow-up of 12 months post-implantation performed by 3 surgeons all belonging to the same center of excellence in penile implant surgery. Conclusions The Rigocon AX implant matches the satisfaction and durability results of those implants already available on the market. The complication due to mechanical failure is similar to other brands, and has reduced significantly after the latest improvement regarding tubing and pump device. Disclosure No
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gayá et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: