The manuscript investigates source disagreement in language-model pretraining, highlighting implications for calibration and alignment.
This manuscript investigates source disagreement in language-model pretraining. It argues that standard next-token cross-entropy collapses source-conditioned disagreement structure into a source-frequency-weighted marginal, making source reliability invisible to the training objective. The paper develops a formal framework for this phenomenon ("consensus collapse"), proves a collapse theorem and a non-identifiability result for source-conditioned families under marginalization, derives consequences for attribution, calibration, and alignment, and evaluates the framework on controlled synthetic corpora. Included are the primary manuscript, a technical note documenting derivations and discarded hypotheses, experimental code, and supporting materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madison Matti Charlton (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: