Science denial causes a range of damaging impacts on society.This is particularly the case with climate science denial, which has resulted in strong polarization around a non-controversial scientific issue, and prolific dissemination of climate misinformation.This in turn has had the effect of reducing public acceptance of climate change, and eroding support for policies to mitigate climate change.In order to develop effective responses to science denial, it is necessary to first understand the drivers of science denial, which leads to deeper understanding of the techniques employed to cast doubt on the reality of climate change.Analysis of denialist techniques can inform development of interventions that neutralize misinformation.Inoculation has been shown to be an effective way to preemptively reduce the influence of climate science denial.Two methods to practically implement inoculation are misconception-based learning (teaching science by addressing scientific misconceptions) and techno¬ cognition (an interdisciplinary approach that implements psychological principles in the design of technological solutions to misinformation).Interventions and procedures developed for the counter¬ ing of climate misinformation may also be applied to other scientific topics rife with misinformation, such as vaccination and evolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John Cook (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: