Currently available tests for platelet activation, such as mean platelet volume and flow cytometry, lack sufficient predictive value or practicality for routine vascular risk assessment.
Is there a practical, simple, and cost-effective index of platelet activity that predicts the risk of coronary heart disease and vascular events?
Currently available tests for platelet activation, including MPV and flow cytometry, lack sufficient evidence or practicality to be used routinely for predicting vascular risk in large populations.
Activated platelets play a role in the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease (CHD). Following activation, platelets change shape, aggregate, and release several bioactive substances. The aim of this review is to identify if there is a simple and cost-effective method that indicates platelet activation and predicts the risk of CHD and vascular events. The rationale for identifying high-risk patients is to reduce their risk of vascular events by administering appropriate and effective antiplatelet treatment, like aspirin, clopidogrel, or combination regimens. Many laboratory tests estimating platelet activity have been described. Some are relatively simple, such as spontaneous or agonist-induced platelet aggregation. Other tests include measuring the mean platelet volume (MPV) or plasma soluble P-selectin levels. Some more complex tests include flow cytometry to determine platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptors, platelet surface P-selectin, platelet-monocyte aggregates, and microparticles. Only few prospective studies assessed the predictive value of platelet activation in healthy individuals. Although the MPV seems an 'easy' method, there are insufficient data supporting its ability to predict the risk of a vascular event in healthy adults. Platelet aggregation, in whole blood or in platelet-rich plasma was not consistently predictive of vascular risk. Soluble P-selectin measurement is a promising method but it needs further evaluation. Flow cytometry methods are costly, time-consuming, and need specialized equipment. Thus, they are unlikely to be useful in estimating the risk in large numbers of patients. There is as yet no ideal test for the detection of platelet activation. Each currently available test has merits and disadvantages. Simple methods such as the MPV and the determination of platelet release products need further evaluation.
Tsiara et al. (Tue,) conducted a review in Coronary heart disease and vascular events. Platelet activation tests (e.g., MPV, platelet aggregation, soluble P-selectin, flow cytometry) was evaluated on Prediction of the risk of CHD and vascular events. Currently available tests for platelet activation, such as mean platelet volume and flow cytometry, lack sufficient predictive value or practicality for routine vascular risk assessment.