Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper proposes that development of effective cognitive-behavioral training (CBT) approaches in academic domains, such as spelling, requires greater appreciation of the instructional character of such interventions. Teaching in its purest form, we argue, is cognitive-behavioral training. Therefore, design of CBT interventions needs to be imbued with greater concern for trainers' (i.e., teachers') knowledge of the academic domain as well as their pedagogical expertise in finely and precisely adjusting their instructional use of language to communicate that knowledge. Learning handicapped students, more than normally achieving peers, require such expertise if they are to learn even basic skills.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerber et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: