Key result
A brief stretch immediately preceding shortening enhanced work during shortening by 28% (P<0.001) compared to an isometric contraction, but reduced net work by 13% (P=0.003) with no energetic benefit.
Why the study?
Does a brief stretch preceding shortening contractions improve net work and efficiency in frog anterior tibialis muscle?
Does a brief stretch preceding shortening contractions improve net work and efficiency in frog anterior tibialis muscle?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A stretch immediately preceding muscle shortening enhances work during shortening but does not impart a net mechanical or energetic benefit to the contraction in frog muscle.
Applying a small stretch to active muscle immediately before shortening results in an increase in force and work done during subsequent shortening. The basis of the increase is not fully understood, having important implications for work and efficiency, and how they are influenced through stretch. We used the anterior tibialis muscle of leopard frogs (Rana pipiens complex) to measure the oxygen consumed and work done during shortening contractions that were immediately preceded by either a brief stretch (5% muscle length over 25 ms) or an isometric contraction (25 ms duration). Work done by the muscle while shortening following stretch was about 28% greater than work done following an isometric contraction (P<0.001). However the net work done during the entire contraction (i.e. accounting for the work required to stretch the muscle) was reduced by 13% if stretch preceded the shortening phase (P=0.003). The energy (oxygen) used during a stretch-shorten cycle was the same as for an isometric-shorten contraction (P=0.34). Likewise, the efficiency of net work (net work/energy used) was only marginally different between shortening contractions preceded by stretch or an isometric phase (P=0.07). Thus, under conditions that were intended to mimic what might occur during animal movement, a stretch that immediately preceded shortening enhanced work during shortening but did not impart a net mechanical or energetic benefit to the contraction. These observations could indicate that stretch simply extends compliant elements that recoil subsequently with some loss of mechanical energy in the process and/or that stretch results in an increase in the number of, and hence work done by, cross bridges during muscle shortening accompanied by a proportionate increase in energy consumed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trinh et al. (2007) studied this question. Brief stretch immediately preceding shortening contraction vs. Isometric contraction (25 ms duration) was evaluated on Work done by the muscle while shortening (28% greater, p=<0.001). A brief stretch immediately preceding shortening enhanced work during shortening by 28% (P<0.001) compared to an isometric contraction, but reduced net work by 13% (P=0.003) with no energetic benefit.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: