ABSTRACT As evidenced in this issue, IMC remains a controversial theoretical concept in terms of generalizing what it is and what it does. However, if MC is viewed from a different paradigmatic perspective on theory, namely that of poststructuralism, then we might consider it as a set of contingently framed practices and discourses where localized, particular practitioner interpretations are just as important as general theoretic ones. When viewed this way, MC emerges as a powerful tool that guides practitioners in developing and implementing marketing communications programs even if they apply it in disparate ways according to their own specific understandings and circumstances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen Jay Gould (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: