Why the study?
The study aimed to test whether changes in low-attenuation muscle area in trunk muscles from an abdominal CT scan could evaluate lifestyle intervention effects without requiring a mid-thigh CT scan.
Does a 1-year lifestyle intervention improve muscle lipid content and cardiometabolic risk in dyslipidemic viscerally obese men?
Does a 1-year lifestyle intervention improve muscle lipid content and cardiometabolic risk in dyslipidemic viscerally obese men?
Changes in trunk low-attenuation muscle areas from an abdominal CT scan can serve as useful indices of muscle lipid content changes following a lifestyle intervention, eliminating the need for an additional mid-thigh scan.
Supports LAM psoas area from abdominal CT as index of muscle lipid changes after lifestyle intervention; extends prior mid-thigh data but leaves open clinical utility.
PURPOSE: Low-attenuation muscle (LAM) area at mid-thigh, a computed tomography (CT)-derived index of intramuscular lipids, is associated with insulin resistance, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. The present study aimed at testing the hypothesis that changes in LAM area in trunk muscles from a single abdominal scan could provide relevant information to evaluate the effects of a lifestyle intervention without the use of a mid-thigh CT scan. METHODS: Cardiometabolic risk variables, including waist circumference, lipoprotein-lipid profile, glucose tolerance, and cardiorespiratory fitness, were assessed in a sample of 102 dyslipidemic viscerally obese men at baseline and after a 1-yr lifestyle intervention. Abdominal (L4-L5) and mid-thigh CT scans were performed and abdominal muscles classified as psoas and core muscles. Scans were segmented to calculate muscle areas, LAM areas, and mean attenuation values. RESULTS: All muscle groups showed a decrease in LAM areas (P < 0.0001) in response to the lifestyle intervention. Changes in LAM areas were significantly associated with changes in triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio and log triglycerides/HDL cholesterol ratio (mid-thigh, 0.20 ≤ |r| ≤ 0.29; psoas, 0.28 ≤ |r| ≤ 0.38; core, 0.29 ≤ |r| ≤ 0.34, P < 0.05). Changes in core LAM area were significantly associated with changes in 2-h glucose levels, glucose area measured during the oral glucose tolerance test and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (0.21 ≤ r ≤ 0.34, P < 0.05). Stepwise regression analyses showed that changes in LAM psoas area were associated with changes in HDL cholesterol and the cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio independently from changes in visceral adiposity. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in trunk LAM areas are useful indices of changes in mid-thigh LAM area observed with a 1-yr lifestyle intervention. Thus, an additional mid-thigh scan is not necessary to evaluate muscle lipid content by CT when an abdominal CT scan is available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maltais et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: