Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) has become standard therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We evaluated whether PEG-IFN pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics account for differences in treatment outcome and whether these parameters might be predictors of therapeutic outcome. Twenty-four IFN-naïve, HCV/human immunodeficiency virus-coinfected patients received PEG-IFN alpha-2b (1.5 microg/kg) once weekly plus daily ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg) for up to 48 weeks. HCV RNA and PEG-IFN alpha concentrations were obtained from samples collected frequently after the first 3 PEG-IFN doses. We modeled HCV kinetics incorporating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Although PEG-IFN concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in sustained virological responders (SVRs) and nonresponders (NRs), the PEG-IFN alpha-2b concentration that decreases HCV production by 50% (EC50) was lower in SVRs compared with NRs (0.04 vs. 0.45 microg/L [P = .014]). Additionally, the median therapeutic quotient (i.e., the ratio between average PEG-IFN concentration and EC50 [C/EC50]), and the PEG-IFN concentration at day 7 divided by EC50 (C(7)/EC50) were significantly increased in SVRs compared with NRs after the first (10.1 vs. 1.0 [P = .012], 2.8 vs. 0.3 [P = .007], respectively) and second (14.0 vs. 1.1 [P = .016], 5.4 vs. 0.4 [P = .02], respectively) PEG-IFN doses. All 3 parameters may be used to identify NRs. In conclusion, PEG-IFN concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters do not differ between SVRs and NRs. In contrast, pharmacodynamic measurements-namely EC50, the therapeutic quotient, and C(7)/EC50--are different in coinfected SVRs and NRs. These parameters might be useful predictors of treatment outcome during the first month of therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talal et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: