Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Purpose Construction professionals encounter a range of psychosocial hazards that can significantly impact their health, well-being, and work performance. This systematic review examines and categorises psychosocial hazards affecting construction professionals, the associated risks and consequences, and how these risks vary across different demographics. It also identifies several research gaps and future research directions. Design/methodology/approach Following the PRISMA guidelines, the review systematically identified and assessed 75 relevant peer-reviewed journal articles. The literature search, guided by keywords shaped by the CoCoPop framework, encompassed five databases: Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest Central, PubMed, and PsycINFO, along with the Google Scholar search, to ensure comprehensive coverage of articles published from 1989 to 2025. Scientometric and content analyses were conducted to identify underlying patterns, followed by an in-depth discussion. Findings Five levels at which psychosocial hazards affecting construction professionals manifest are: (1) task, (2) organisational, (3) interpersonal, (4) personal, and (5) environmental. These hazards culminate in three primary risk domains: (1) stress, (2) mental health impacts, and (3) physical health impacts, particularly when exposure is prolonged and coping mechanisms are inadequate. The review also highlighted unique hazards across various demographics based on gender, age, experience, and work settings. Additionally, it identified theoretical frameworks or models underpinning psychosocial research on construction professionals. Originality/value The paper reveals both patterns in the existing literature and gaps for future research, thereby contributing to the theory and practice concerning psychosocial risk management in the construction industry.
Kumah et al. (Fri,) studied this question.