Key result
Mapping and ablation of inducible atrial flutter during pulmonary vein antrum isolation resulted in no statistically significant difference in recurrence rates compared to no further ablation.
Why the study?
Does mapping and ablation of inducible atrial flutter during pulmonary vein antrum isolation reduce atrial flutter recurrence in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=25)
Does mapping and ablation of inducible atrial flutter during pulmonary vein antrum isolation reduce atrial flutter recurrence in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation?
Prophylactic mapping and ablation of inducible atrial flutter during pulmonary vein antrum isolation for atrial fibrillation provides little benefit in preventing long-term flutter recurrence.
Omitting ablation of inducible flutter during PVI does not increase recurrence; challenges routine prophylactic ablation in AF.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of atrial flutter (AFL) post pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is reported to be between 8% and 20%. The need for right or left AFL ablation during the initial PVAI procedure remains controversial. We prospectively compared mapping and ablation versus no ablative treatment of inducible AFL during PVAI. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 220 patients (167 men, mean age 56+/-15 years) with symptomatic AF presenting for PVAI, burst pacing from the high right atrium and coronary sinus was performed to determine AFL inducibility. A total of 25 patients with sustained (17 patients) or reproducible (eight patients) AFL were included in this study. Patients were randomized to mapping and ablation of AFL using the CARTO 3D mapping system (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) versus no further ablation. Typical AFL was induced in 48% of the patients. During a follow-up of 12+/-4 months, recurrences were determined by serial 48-h Holter and event monitors. Recurrence rates, time to recurrence, and AFL cycle length differences between both groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that inducibility of AFL post PVAI does not predict long-term incidence of AFL. Moreover, this study demonstrates little benefit to mapping and ablation of these arrhythmias during the PVAI procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmidt et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in Symptomatic atrial fibrillation with inducible atrial flutter (n=25). Mapping and ablation of atrial flutter vs. No further ablation was evaluated on Recurrence rates, time to recurrence, and atrial flutter cycle length differences. Mapping and ablation of inducible atrial flutter during pulmonary vein antrum isolation resulted in no statistically significant difference in recurrence rates compared to no further ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: