Accessible services are not always available for survivors of sexual assault and intimate partner violence who are d/Deaf/Hard of Hearing (D/HH). Constraints on communication for staff at issue-based nonprofits often negatively impacts their work to achieve the organization’s mission. Drawing on data gathered from 12-months of ethnographic research at a regional, issue-based, anti-violence nonprofit in the southwestern U.S., this ethnography investigates tensional knots that restrict staff from supporting D/HH clients. Mandated accommodations disrupt ableist practices and construct knotted organizational tensions between: (a) generalized vs. specialized support for clients, and (b) routine vs. non-routine intervention practices. Participants describe a complex and tangled set of organizational tensions in their engagement of generalized, routine structures, while inventing new, non-routine avenues to communicate support to their D/HH clients. Ultimately, the tensional knots uncover issues nonprofits face with addressing accessibility and the interplay of tensions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biss et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: