Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and remnants were estimated to be at least 3.9 times more atherogenic than LDL on a per-particle basis for coronary heart disease (OR 3.9; 95% CI 2.8-5.4).
Observational
Are triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and remnants more atherogenic than LDL on a per-particle basis, and does this impact the causal association of non-HDL-C with CHD?
Mendelian randomization analysis using 1,357 SNPs from the UK Biobank to assess the atherogenicity of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and remnants compared to LDL.
Genetically predicted increase in TRL/remnant-C (using SNPs in cluster 10)
Genetically predicted increase in LDL-C (using SNPs in cluster 1)
Coronary heart disease (myocardial infarction plus revascularisation)hard clinical
TRL/remnants are approximately 4 times more atherogenic than LDL per particle, suggesting that risk prediction models may need adjustment for percentage TRL/remnant-C.
Odds Ratio: 3.9 (95% CI 2.8–5.4)
Background Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and remnants (TRL/remnants) have a causal but not yet quantified relationship with coronary heart disease (CHD - myocardial infarction plus revascularisation). Objectives To estimate TRL/remnant per-particle atherogenicity, investigate causal relationships with inflammation, and determine whether difference in the atherogenicity of TRL/remnants and LDL impact the causal association of non-HDL-C with CHD. Methods Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (n=1357) identified by genome-wide association in the UK Biobank were ranked into 10 clusters according to the effect on TRL/remnant-C versus LDL-C. Mendelian randomisation analysis was used to estimate for each SNP cluster CHD odds ratios per 10 mg/dL apoB and per 0.33 mmol/L non-HDL-cholesterol, and to evaluate association of TRL/remnants with biomarkers of systemic inflammation. Results SNPs in cluster 1 predominantly affected LDL-C while SNPs in cluster 10 predominantly affected TRL/remnant-C. CHD risk per genetically predicted increase in apoB and in non-HDL-C rose across clusters. Odds ratio per 10 mg/dL higher apoB was 1.1595%CI:1.11-1.19 in cluster 1 versus 1.7095%CI:1.52-1.90 in cluster 10. Comparing odds ratios between these TRL/remnant predominant- and LDL predominant-clusters, we estimated that TRL/remnants were at least 3.995%CI:2.8-5.4 times more atherogenic than LDL on a per-particle basis. For non-HDL-C, CHD odds ratios per 0.33 mmol/L rose from 1.151.11−1.19 for cluster 1 to 1.401.30−1.50 for cluster 10. TRL/remnants exhibited causal relationships with inflammation, but this did not explain their greater atherogenicity. Conclusion TRL/remnants are about 4 times more atherogenic than LDL. Variation in the causal association of non-HDL-C with CHD indicates that adjustment for percentage TRL/remnant-C may be needed for accurate risk prediction.
“Studies consistently demonstrate that triglyceride-rich particles are more atherogenic than LDL, maybe even four times more atherogenic, meaning particle for particle, they're more likely to cause heart disease than LDL themselves.”
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Elias Björnson
Center for Clinical Research Dalarna
Martin Adiels
Preventive Cardiology
Anders Gummesson
Vascular Medicine
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
University of Helsinki
University of Glasgow
University of Gothenburg
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Björnson et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Coronary heart disease. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and remnants (TRL/remnants) vs. LDL was evaluated on Coronary heart disease (myocardial infarction plus revascularisation) (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.8-5.4). Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and remnants were estimated to be at least 3.9 times more atherogenic than LDL on a per-particle basis for coronary heart disease (OR 3.9; 95% CI 2.8-5.4).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a243a65ee4ed919607e64e9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.07.034
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: