Key result
A pre-switch time in therapeutic range ≤45% was associated with a higher risk of non-persistence to DOACs within 1 year compared to >45% (14.0% vs 9.8%; HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.22-1.97).
Why the study?
NVAF patients are advised to switch from a VKA to DOAC when TTR is low, but whether pre-switch TTR determines DOAC persistence patterns was unknown.
Does low pre-switch time in therapeutic range (TTR) increase the risk of non-persistence to DOACs in NVAF patients switching from VKAs?
Cohort (n=3,696)
Yes
Does low pre-switch time in therapeutic range (TTR) increase the risk of non-persistence to DOACs in NVAF patients switching from VKAs?
Hazard Ratio: 1.55 (95% CI 1.22–1.97)
Absolute Event Rate: 14% vs 9.8%
Patients with NVAF who switch from VKAs to DOACs due to poor TTR are at higher risk of subsequent DOAC non-adherence, highlighting a need for closer monitoring in this subgroup.
May identify patients for closer post-switch monitoring; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve DOAC persistence.
BACKGROUND: Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients are advised to switch from a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) to direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) when time in therapeutic range (TTR) is low. OBJECTIVE: To examine if pre-switch TTR determines persistence patterns in NVAF patients who are switched from a VKA to DOAC. PATIENTS/METHODS: Adult NVAF patients from three Dutch anticoagulation clinics who were newly switched from a VKA to DOAC between July 1, 2013 and September 30, 2018 were stratified by pre-switch TTR levels. DOAC prescription records were examined to determine persistence patterns according to a 100-day prescription gap. Cumulative incidences of non-persistence to DOAC were estimated using the cumulative incidence competing risk method. The association of pre-switch TTR levels with DOAC non-persistence was evaluated by Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 3696 NVAF patients were included, of whom 690 (18.7%) had a pre-switch TTR ≤ 45%. After switching from VKA to DOAC, 14.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.3-17.0%) of the patients with a pre-switch TTR ≤ 45% became non-persistent to DOAC within 1 year, while 9.8% (95% CI 8.7-11.0%) did in those with a pre-switch TTR > 45%. In a multivariable model, a pre-switch TTR ≤ 45% was associated with a higher risk of non-persistence to DOAC (adjusted hazard ratio 1.55, 95% CI 1.22-1.97). Results were similar when using other cut-off points (60% or 70%) to define a low TTR. CONCLUSION: NVAF patients switching from VKA to DOAC due to a low pre-switch TTR saw a worse persistence pattern to DOAC after the switch compared to patients with a high pre-switch TTR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toorop et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=3,696). Pre-switch TTR ≤ 45% vs. Pre-switch TTR > 45% was evaluated on non-persistence to DOAC within 1 year (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.22-1.97). A pre-switch time in therapeutic range ≤45% was associated with a higher risk of non-persistence to DOACs within 1 year compared to >45% (14.0% vs 9.8%; HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.22-1.97).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: