Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary To investigate information processing strategies employed by creative and noncreative Ss, the Unusual Uses test, a reading comprehension test, and an essay posttest were administered to 84 male and female undergraduate volunteers, who then wrote SO-word summary and “flight of fancy” passages on the essay contents. No differences were obtained for either reading test or essay comprehension; however, analyses of passage structure and theme characteristics showed a greater number of logical intrusions and fewer incorrect intrusions for creative than for noncreative S s. Results seemed to indicate relatively pronounced qualitative differences in information processing approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glover et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: