Key result
ConvLSTM and LSTM models accurately tracked vascular wall motion in plane-wave ultrasound, with ConvLSTM outperforming both the LSTM model and the traditional cross-correlation method.
Why the study?
Vascular wall motion can be used to diagnose cardiovascular diseases, motivating the use of long short-term memory neural networks to track it in plane-wave-based ultrasound imaging.
Do LSTM-based models improve the accuracy of tracking vascular wall motion in plane-wave-based ultrasound imaging compared to the cross-correlation method?
Do LSTM-based models improve the accuracy of tracking vascular wall motion in plane-wave-based ultrasound imaging compared to the cross-correlation method?
ConvLSTM models can accurately and precisely track vascular wall motion using plane-wave-based ultrasound imaging, outperforming traditional cross-correlation methods.
May refine preclinical vascular ultrasound tracking; leaves open human validation before clinical adoption.
Objective. Vascular wall motion can be used to diagnose cardiovascular diseases. In this study, long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks were used to track vascular wall motion in plane-wave-based ultrasound imaging. Approach. The proposed LSTM and convolutional LSTM (ConvLSTM) models were trained using ultrasound data from simulations and tested experimentally using a tissue-mimicking vascular phantom and an in vivo study using a carotid artery. The performance of the models in the simulation was evaluated using the mean square error from axial and lateral motions and compared with the cross-correlation (XCorr) method. Statistical analysis was performed using the Bland–Altman plot, Pearson correlation coefficient, and linear regression in comparison with the manually annotated ground truth. Main results. For the in vivo data, the median error and 95% limit of agreement from the Bland–Altman analysis were (0.01, 0.13), (0.02, 0.19), and (0.03, 0.18), the Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.97, 0.94, and 0.94, respectively, and the linear equations were 0.89 x + 0.02, 0.84 x + 0.03, and 0.88 x + 0.03 from linear regression for the ConvLSTM model, LSTM model, and XCorr method, respectively. In the longitudinal and transverse views of the carotid artery, the LSTM-based models outperformed the XCorr method. Overall, the ConvLSTM model was superior to the LSTM model and XCorr method. Significance. This study demonstrated that vascular wall motion can be tracked accurately and precisely using plane-wave-based ultrasound imaging and the proposed LSTM-based models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seo et al. (2023) studied Cardiovascular diseases. LSTM and ConvLSTM models vs. Cross-correlation (XCorr) method was evaluated on Vascular wall motion tracking accuracy. ConvLSTM and LSTM models accurately tracked vascular wall motion in plane-wave ultrasound, with ConvLSTM outperforming both the LSTM model and the traditional cross-correlation method.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: