Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The paper develops a model about the coalition between terrorism and crime. An organisation can get funded by a benefactor which enables focusing on terrorist objectives, or funded by criminal mercenaries which decrease the terrorist organisation's ideological purity. We show how a balance is struck between these two concerns. We support empirically the two hypotheses that terrorist organisations' ideological orientation depends positively on steady funding by a benefactor and on the government's ability to impose sanctions on their activities. Otherwise terrorist organisations transform into criminal organisations. A terrorist organisation altruistically provides public goods for the community. A criminal organisation, however, provides private goods for itself. We offer examples of organisations retaining their terrorist ideology, and organisations transforming into criminal organisations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hausken et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: