Generating a set of keyphrases that convey the main concepts discussed in a document has been applied to improve various applications including document retrieval and online advertising. The state-of-the-art approaches mostly rely on the neural sequence-to-sequence framework to generate keyphrases. However, training such deep neural networks either requires a significant amount of human efforts in obtaining ground truth keyphrases or suffers from lower quality training data derived from weakly supervised signals. More recently, pre-trained language models are fine-tuned to build more data-efficient keyphrase generation models. Yet, the documents often need to be truncated to adapt to the pre-trained context window. On the other hand, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive abilities in understanding very long text and generating answers for a wide range of natural language processing tasks, making them great candidates for improving keyphrase generation. There however is a lack of a systematic study on how to use LLMs, especially in an industrial setting that requires low generation latency. In this work, we present an empirical study to facilitate a more informed use of LLMs for keyphrase generation. We compare zero-shot and few-shot in-context learning with parameter efficient fine-tuning using a number of open-source LLMs. We show that using only a handful of well selected human annotated samples, the LLMs already outperform the fine-tuned language model baselines. When thousands of human labeled samples are available, fine-tuned large language models significantly improve the amount and the quality of the generated keyphrases. To enable efficient keyphrase generation at scale, we distill the knowledge from LLMs to a base-size language model. Our evaluation shows significant increase in user reach when the generated keyphrases are used for contextual targeting at Yahoo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: