The solid-state conformation of the cyclic decapeptide phakellistatin 8, cyclo[Pro1-Pro2-Ile3-Phe4-Val5-Leu6-Pro7-Pro8-Tyr9-Ile10] has been determined by X-ray methods. [Crystal data: orthorhombic; P21212; a = 20.294(2), b = 24.141(6), c = 13.903(3) Å. Least-squares refinement of 10061 reflections (I >2σ(I)) led to residuals R1 = 0.0651 (Sheldrick wR2 = 0.1749).] The cyclic decapeptide includes (1) a 5→1 transannular α-turn type H-bond, encompassing the Pro1, Pro2, and Ile3 residues and involving the Phe4 amide hydrogen and the Ile10 carbonyl, (2) an intramolecular 3→1 type VIa γ-turn type of H-bond, encompassing the Phe4 residue and involving the Val5 amide hydrogen and the Ile3 carbonyl, and (3) an intramolecular 4→1 type VIa β-turn H-bond, encompassing the Pro7 and Pro8 residues and involving the Tyr9 amide hydrogen and the Leu6 carbonyl. All backbone dihedral angles fall within normal, low-energy regions except for two amino acid residues, Phe4 (Φ, Ψ = 71°, −41°) and Tyr9 (Φ, Ψ = 75°, 31°), the side chains of which are found to fold back over the peptide backbone. Conformations of the four proline residues for phakellistatin 8 can be classified as follows: Pro1 Cs-Cγexo, Pro2 C2-Cβexo(Cγendo), Pro7 Cs-Cγendo and Pro8 C2-Cβexo(Cγendo). Examination of phakellistatin 8 and the decapeptide antamanide show the two compounds are quite similar, both in overall backbone conformation, proline ring conformations, and the presence of nearly identical α-turns involving one of the Pro-Pro pairs. Both molecules are highly hydrated when crystallized from aqueous solvents and both exhibit channel formation in the solid state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herald et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: