Study reconstructs wind fields to assess nonlinear aeroelastic responses in bridges, suggesting limitations of stationary models.
Non-synoptic extreme winds such as thunderstorms and downbursts exhibit pronounced non-stationarity, with rapid variations in wind speed, turbulence characteristics, and angle of attack that challenge conventional stationary wind-field models and linearized aeroelastic formulations. This study proposes a measurement-driven numerical framework to reconstruct and simulate fully non-stationary wind fields from sparse full-scale monitoring data on long-span bridges, providing physically consistent inputs for nonlinear time-domain aeroelastic analyses. Monitored records are processed to extract time-varying wind parameters, which are then spatially reconstructed along the deck and used to generate non-stationary wind fields through an EPSD-based synthesis. The resulting wind inputs are employed in nonlinear time-domain aeroelastic simulations and compared against a standard stationary frequency-domain benchmark based on an equivalent synoptic wind representation. The comparison highlights the limitations of stationary assumptions in capturing transient and spatially localized response features induced by non-synoptic events. To assess the generality of the observed mechanisms, the analysis is extended to multiple wind records with different degrees of non-synoptic character and to multiple suspension bridges. The results show that the response features are primarily driven by the non-stationary nature of the wind, while structural properties mainly influence their magnitude and spatial distribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pace et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: