Evaluates glycemic control improvements in teens with type 1 diabetes using InPen technology, implying benefits for diabetes education.
Introduction and Objective: Mealtime insulin dosing requires complex calculations that can be challenging for teens with uncontrolled type 1 diabetes (T1D), especially those who have limited math skills. Diabetes numeracy in pediatric T1D is not well characterized. In this study we evaluated the utility of using the InPen™and its management app to improve glycemic control and diabetes numeracy in pediatric T1D. Methods: A single-arm 24-week pilot study examining change in glycemic control among adolescent and young adults with uncontrolled T1D at 12 and 24-weeks after using the InPen. The Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT-14) was administered at baseline and 24- weeks to better understand any relationship between intervention and glycemic control. Results: This study enrolled 17 patients of whom 82.4% were African Americans, 64.7% were male, mean age of 16.8 (12 - 21.7) years, and duration of diabetes of 7.2 (0.5 - 14.8) years. Mean HbA1c did not change significantly from baseline (11.2%) to 24 weeks following InPen use (10.8%). Participants overall had poor diabetes numeracy at baseline (mean of 53.8% correct answers) and scored lowest in the nutrition domain (31.4% correct answers, p < 0.001). DNT-14 scores in blood glucose monitoring and insulin administration domains were significantly associated with glycemic control and duration of diabetes (β=-11.2 and β= 3.3, respectively; p < 0.01 and 0.05). Conclusion: Assessment of diabetes numeracy in urban teens with uncontrolled T1D may provide new insights for better targeted interventions in diabetes education and technology to help improve health outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
BUGGS-SAXTON et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: