Review evaluates decoverslipping methods and freezer-based techniques for aspirate smears, highlighting key challenges.
INTRODUCTION: Archival cytology aspirate smears are increasingly used for ancillary testing, yet decoverslipping remains a practical bottleneck. This study reviews published decoverslipping methodologies and evaluates freezer-based strategies for aspirate smears. METHODS: Published decoverslipping techniques were reviewed and compared with respect to turnaround time, tissue preservation, safety and suitability for downstream applications. An institutional study at MD Anderson Cancer Center evaluated freezer-based decoverslipping (-20°C and -80°C) of archival aspirate smears (40 cases, 80 slides) across four freeze-duration groups (1-2 min, 3-5 min, 10 min and 15 min). RESULTS: Aspirate smears prepared with thick xylene-based mounting media and rigid glass coverslips were consistently resistant to cold-based removal, with complete removal achieved in only 26 of 80 slides (32.5%), corresponding to 22 of 76 evaluable aspirate slides (28.9%). The highest per-slide success rate was observed at 10 min (15/40; 37.5%). A directional advantage for -80°C over -20°C was apparent but insufficient to overcome the fundamental resistance of this preparation type. Marked intra-case variability indicated that slide-specific factors were the dominant determinants of outcome. CONCLUSION: Mounting-media thickness and coverslip composition are primary determinants of decoverslipping success and represent under-recognised preanalytical variables. These findings underscore the need to align coverslipping workflows with anticipated downstream ancillary testing requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Htun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: