Key result
Higher gut microbiota dietary index linked to ~69% lower risk of self-reported dysglycemia.
Why the study?
Current evidence suggests gut microbiota dysbiosis accelerates aging and aging-related diseases via pro-inflammatory pathways, prompting evaluation of dietary quality regarding inflammation, gut microbiota, and chronic diseases.
Is dietary quality, assessed by inflammation and gut microbiota indices, associated with chronic diseases in urban Chinese adults?
Cross-Sectional
Is dietary quality, assessed by inflammation and gut microbiota indices, associated with chronic diseases in urban Chinese adults?
Odds Ratio: 0.311 (95% CI 0.118–0.818)
A gut microbiota-favorable diet is associated with a lower risk of self-reported dysglycemia in middle-aged and elderly urban Chinese adults.
Supports DI-GM for dysglycemia risk stratification in Chinese adults; leaves open causal effects pending prospective trials.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Current evidence suggests that gut microbiota dysbiosis accelerates aging and aging-related diseases through pro-inflammatory pathways. This study aimed to evaluate dietary quality in relation to inflammation and gut microbiota, and to explore their relationship with chronic diseases among urban Chinese adults aged 40-69 years. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted among urban Chinese adults aged 40-69 years. Dietary quality was assessed by dietary intake, dietary inflammation index (DII), and dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM). Log-binomial regression was per-formed to examine the associations between DII, DI-GM and chronic diseases. RESULTS: An excessive energy proportion from fat (37.4%) and an insufficient contribution from carbohydrates (44.7%) indicated an imbalance in macronutrient intake. The medians and interquartile ranges for DII and DI-GM of the participants were 1.3 (0.2, 2.5) and 3.0 (2.0,5.0), respectively, suggesting a pro-inflammatory and gut microbiota-unfavorable dietary tendency. Livestock contributed most to dietary inflammation in the population (standardized β = 0.251), whereas vegetables showed the strongest inverse effect (standardized β = -0.500). A higher DI-GM score was suggested to be a protective factor against self-reported dysglycemia (OR = 0.311; 95%CI: 0.118, 0.818). CONCLUSIONS: The participants exhibited an imbalance in macronutrient intake and a dietary tendency that was pro-inflammatory and unfavorable to gut microbiota. Notably, this study revealed a negative relationship between DI-GM and dysglycemia in middle-aged and elderly population, which under-scores the potential of targeting gut microbiota through diet for chronic disease prevention in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in chronic diseases. Higher dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) score vs. Lower DI-GM score was evaluated on self-reported dysglycemia (OR 0.311, 95% CI 0.118, 0.818). A higher dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) score was associated with a lower risk of self-reported dysglycemia (OR 0.311; 95% CI 0.118-0.818).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: