Retrospective study investigates CYP2C19 variability effects on adverse events in epilepsy patients treated with cenobamate, suggesting increased risk for intermediates.
Background: Cenobamate is a novel antiseizure medication with potential interactions involving cytochrome P450 enzymes, including CYP2C19. Genetic variability in CYP2C19 may influence drug metabolism and tolerability, although its clinical relevance in cenobamate-treated patients remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study including 48 adults with drug-resistant epilepsy treated with cenobamate. Patients were stratified by concomitant use of CYP2C19-substrate ASMs (patients with CYP2C19 substrates vs. patients without CYP2C19 substrates). CYP2C19 genotype was classified into metabolizer phenotypes. Adverse events (AEs) were categorized as potentially CYP-mediated or likely unrelated to CYP-mediated pharmacokinetic mechanisms based on clinical assessment, temporal association, and known pharmacological interaction profiles. Associations were explored using descriptive statistics and regression models. Results: Overall, 58.3% of patients received CYP2C19-substrate ASMs. AEs were more frequent among patients with CYP2C19 substrates (71.4% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.001), with potentially CYP-mediated AEs observed only in this group (32.1% vs. 0%; p < 0.001). Intermediate metabolizers showed a higher proportion of potentially CYP-mediated AEs (87.5%; p < 0.001). This pattern was not observed in patients without CYP2C19 substrates. Regression analyses suggested increased risk in intermediate metabolizers, although estimates were imprecise and should be considered exploratory. Conclusions: An exploratory association between CYP2C19 variability and AE occurrence was observed in patients treated with cenobamate combined mainly with clobazam and other CYP2C19-substrate ASMs. Intermediate metabolizers may represent a higher-risk subgroup, but these preliminary findings require prospective confirmation with pharmacokinetic monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Falcicchio et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: