Evaluates the effectiveness of path planning algorithms in simulated mining environments, highlighting performance differences.
Autonomous navigation is a key requirement for underground mine automation, where the choice of a suitable global path planner plays a significant role. In this study, four representative planning approaches—Dijkstra’s algorithm, A*, Rapidly exploring Random Tree (RRT*), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)—were evaluated on a differential-drive mobile robot within the ROS navigation framework. The algorithms were tested in two simulated underground environments: a room-and-pillar layout with relatively open space and multiple path alternatives and a narrow tunnel scenario designed to reflect more constrained mining conditions. The results indicate that Dijkstra’s algorithm consistently produced the shortest paths with the lowest computation times, while A* showed comparable performance with slightly higher computational effort. RRT* required modifications to operate effectively in narrow tunnels and exhibited significantly longer planning times. PSO, although capable of generating near-optimal solutions in open spaces, showed limitations in constrained environments due to collision handling and path feasibility issues. Differences in replanning behavior were observed when unknown obstacles were introduced. Overall, graph-based planners such as A* and Dijkstra’s algorithm demonstrated more stable and predictable performance. Future work will focus on validating these findings in real mining environments, particularly considering wheel slippage, sensor noise, and path generation challenges in narrow tunnel conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdukodirov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: