Key result
Preprocedural statins linked to improved GFR, with high-intensity use showing ~185% higher AKI risk.
Why the study?
Acute kidney injury and reduced glomerular filtration rate frequently complicate TAVR, prompting evaluation of the impact of preprocedural statin use and intensity on post-TAVR renal outcomes.
Does preprocedural statin use and intensity improve 30-day renal outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR?
Cohort (n=810)
No
Does preprocedural statin use and intensity improve 30-day renal outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR?
Effect estimate: AME 20.7% (95% CI 12.3%-29.1%)
p-value: p=<0.001
While preprocedural statin therapy generally improves short-term renal outcomes post-TAVR, high-intensity statins are associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury and GFR deterioration.
High-intensity statins warrant AKI caution pre-TAVR; observational data leaves optimal strategy hypothesis-generating.
Aims: Acute kidney injury (AKI) and reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) frequently complicate transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We aimed to assess the impact of preprocedural statin use and intensity on renal outcomes within 30 days post-TAVR. Methods and Results: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal cohort study including 810 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR at Kaplan Medical Center, Israel (January 2014–August 2024). Patients were stratified by statin use (users, n = 620; non-users, n = 190) and statin intensity (high-intensity statin [HIS], n = 264; low-to-moderate intensity [LMIS], n = 356). The primary outcome was the 30-day change in eGFR; the secondary outcome was the 30-day incidence of AKI. Multinomial logistic and Cox regression analyses adjusted for baseline confounders were utilized. Statin use significantly increased the likelihood of GFR improvement (average marginal effect [AME], 20.7%; 95% CI, 12.3%–29.1%; p<0.001) and reduced AKI incidence (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.525; 95% CI, 0.313–0.881; p=0.015). Conversely, HIS significantly raised the risk of GFR deterioration (AME, 10.3%; 95% CI, 2.9%–17.8%) and AKI (adjusted HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.52–5.34; p=0.001), particularly in the early postoperative period. Conclusion: Statin therapy is associated with improved short-term renal outcomes following TAVR. However, high-intensity statins appear to increase renal risks. Personalization of statin intensity during peri-procedural management is essential to optimize patient outcomes, carefully balancing cardiovascular benefits and potential renal harms. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to identify optimal statin management strategies post-TAVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khadija et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (n=810). Preprocedural statin use and intensity vs. Statin non-users and low-to-moderate intensity statin users was evaluated on 30-day change in eGFR (likelihood of GFR improvement) (AME 20.7%, 95% CI 12.3%-29.1%, p=<0.001). Preprocedural statin use increased the likelihood of 30-day GFR improvement (AME 20.7%; 95% CI 12.3%-29.1%; p<0.001), whereas high-intensity statins increased the risk of AKI (HR 2.85).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: