Key result
Right atrial appendages were larger (p < 0.001) but showed lower muscle density (p = 0.007) than left atrial appendages, with transesophageal echocardiography excelling for visualization.
Why the study?
The study aimed to quantify macroscopic variations in pectinate muscle architecture in human atrial appendages and evaluate their visualization using clinical imaging modalities to inform catheter ablation, pacing, and stroke risk stratification.
Observational (n=153)
Detailed anatomical characterization of left and right atrial appendages provides insights for clinical imaging, catheter ablation, pacing, and stroke risk stratification.
Anatomical differences may refine appendage assessment during ablation or imaging; leaves open effects on stroke risk or outcomes.
Human atrial chambers derive from distinct embryonic anlagens, the original embryonic atria gradually transforming into the so-called auricles, or atrial appendages. This study quantifies macroscopic variations in pectinate muscle architecture in human atrial appendages and evaluates their visualization using clinical imaging modalities. We examined 153 cadaveric donor hearts (103 specified sex: 61 female, 42 male; plus 50 unspecified), employing gross dissection, ex vivo micro-CT, histology, and in vivo clinical imaging (CT angiography, MRI, and transthoracic/transesophageal echocardiography). Left atrial appendage (LAA) morphologies (Wang classification) comprised chicken-wing (41%), cactus (23%), cauliflower (22%), and windsock (14%) types, with 11 ± 4 (mean ± SD) main pectinate muscles (length: 47 ± 16 mm). Right atrial appendage (RAA) pectinate muscle arrangements (Loukas classification) were dominated by type IV (41%), followed by types I/II (22%/20%), with 17 ± 4 muscles (length: 75 ± 17 mm); the RAAs were larger (p < 0.001) but showed lower muscle density (p = 0.007) than the LAAs. All modalities resolved main pectinate bundles, with angio-CT providing superior LAA detail; transesophageal echocardiography excelled for both sides. Precise atrial appendage morphology informs catheter ablation, pacing, and stroke risk stratification, bridging anatomical and clinical perspectives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lexová et al. (2026) reported an observational. Anatomical evaluation vs. Left vs Right atrial appendages was evaluated on Pectinate muscle architecture, size, and density (p=<0.001). Right atrial appendages were larger (p < 0.001) but showed lower muscle density (p = 0.007) than left atrial appendages, with transesophageal echocardiography excelling for visualization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: