Key result
Metabolic Wellness Program yields mixed experiences with CGMs and sustained behavior changes in healthcare workers.
Why the study?
Maintaining healthy behaviors is difficult for health care workers in high-stress environments, and the in-depth experience and impact of continuous glucose monitor-guided lifestyle interventions like the Metabolic Wellness Program were not well understood.
Does a CGM-guided Metabolic Wellness Program improve experience and sustained behavior change in health care workers?
Does a CGM-guided Metabolic Wellness Program improve experience and sustained behavior change in health care workers?
A CGM-guided metabolic wellness program for healthcare workers yielded mixed qualitative experiences, with some reporting sustained behavior changes and others experiencing anxiety or missing ongoing accountability.
Variable experiences and accountability gaps suggest no immediate practice change; leaves open efficacy of CGM-guided programs for healthcare workers.
Introduction and Objective: Implementing lifestyle interventions guided by continuous glucose monitor (CGM) data can potentially prevent progression and reduce risk of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Maintaining healthy behaviors is particularly difficult in high-stress work environments like health care workers (HCWs). Sutter Health created a Metabolic Wellness Program (MWP) to educate on interpreting CGM data to help make personalized and sustainable lifestyle changes. We sought to understand the experience and impact of MWP for HCWs in-depth. Methods: At least three months after participating in MWP, two researchers conducted semi-structured interviews that were audio-recorded and transcribed. De-identified transcripts were uploaded into Databricks, and we used Open AI’s GPT OSS 120b to generate initial themes and supporting quotations. Themes were validated, refined, and finalized by human qualitative experts. Results: We interviewed 29 participants (7 metabolically healthy, 11 with pre-diabetes, 11 with T2D). Many participants mentioned their main motivations for joining MWP were family history and/or currently had prediabetes/T2D. Many said that they felt these sessions were better than primary care as they received “more in-depth” and specific information than general advice of “manage weight and exercise.” Participants reported mixed feelings about CGMs, with some expressing benefit from directly seeing impact of food and exercise while others noted additional “anxiety” from “spikes” and “alarms.” Sustained behavior changes months after MWP were also mixed, with some making “lasting changes” through increased exercise after meals and “eating carbs last” while others missed “accountability” from MWP or not having additional CGMs. Conclusion: The findings suggest that MWP may help to improve metabolic health and provide some sustained behavior change to potentially decrease the risk of diabetes and pre-diabetes in HCWs. Disclosure C.D. Stults: None. K.A. Gillespie: None. R. Chapman: None. A. Deacon (Piazza): None. R. Sinha: Advisory Panel; Current; Digbi Health. R. Viswanathan: None. S. McClendon: None. D. Kerr: Stock/Shareholder; Current; Glooko, Inc. Research Support; Current; Abbott Diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stults et al. (2026) studied Metabolic health (healthy, pre-diabetes, type 2 diabetes) (n=29). Metabolic Wellness Program (MWP) guided by continuous glucose monitor (CGM) data was evaluated on Experience and impact of the Metabolic Wellness Program (qualitative themes). Qualitative interviews of 29 health care workers revealed mixed experiences with continuous glucose monitors and sustained behavior changes months after participating in a Metabolic Wellness Program.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: