Reveals distinct formulation effects on reheating dynamics in theoretical models, suggesting significant implications for cosmology.
This paper studies formulation-dependent access to the moving Phase-IV reheating window in the dynamic reheating phase framework. Even with a common Jordan-frame seed, metric and Palatini formulations generate different Einstein-frame effective histories and therefore different trajectories in complex reheating phase space. The difference is quantified by onset shift, boundary displacement, and access efficiency, which together define a dynamic formulation discriminator. V2: This version upgrades the manuscript from a conceptual framework to an explicit result. A minimal formulation-dependent benchmark model is introduced, in which metric and Palatini trajectories are computed from a common Jordan-frame seed under a controlled deformation of the effective reheating history. The dynamic observables are reformulated in a numerically stable manner using a regularized logarithmic-derivative prescription and a coarse-grained access curve. The main result is now demonstrated explicitly: the two formulations produce distinct access curves, a nonzero onset displacement ΔuIV(P−M)(R∗)Δ uIV(P-M)(R_*)ΔuIV(P−M)(R∗), and a nonzero access-efficiency gap ΔE(P−M)(R∗)Δ E(P-M)(R_*)ΔE(P−M)(R∗) over a finite threshold range. A robustness scan in the (cP,R∗)(c_P, R_*)(cP,R∗) plane shows that the sign of the onset displacement remains stable across a finite domain of formulation deformation. An analytic estimate is also provided, showing that the onset shift is controlled by the relative decay rates of the effective amplitude and phase-rotation histories, explaining the origin and sign of the discriminator. As a result, the moving Phase-IV boundary is no longer only a conceptual construct but functions as an operational formulation discriminator once the dynamic framework is closed by an explicit reheating history.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hiroyuki Shioiri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: