Key result
Clinical biomarkers and plasma proteomics predict incident cardiovascular-kidney-liver-metabolic disease with 0.78 AUC.
Why the study?
Traditional risk models for cardiovascular-kidney-liver-metabolic disease often yield miscalibrated or unstable predictions, particularly in data-sparse regions.
Does integrating clinical biomarkers and plasma proteomics improve uncertainty-calibrated risk prediction for cardiovascular-kidney-liver-metabolic disease?
Population
49,312 UK Biobank participants with proteomic profiling
Comparison
Machine learning prediction framework integrating clinical biomarkers and plasma proteomics
Design
Cohort study
Follow-up
Median 12.3-year
Authors
Loading...
May refine observational CKLM risk estimates; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Cohort (n=49,312)
Does integrating clinical biomarkers and plasma proteomics improve uncertainty-calibrated risk prediction for cardiovascular-kidney-liver-metabolic disease?
Integrating clinical and proteomic data with machine learning provides accurate, uncertainty-calibrated risk estimates for cardiovascular-kidney-liver-metabolic disease.
Xu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular-kidney-liver-metabolic (CKLM) disease (n=49,312). Clinical biomarkers and plasma proteomics was evaluated on First occurrence of chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Integrating clinical biomarkers and plasma proteomics achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.78 for predicting incident cardiovascular-kidney-liver-metabolic disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: