Evaluates groundwater quality and contamination vulnerability in Western Saudi Arabia, indicating critical resource management needs.
Groundwater resources in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) are important for meeting the needs of human communities, agriculture, and industry. In Western KSA, groundwater from coastal aquifers is an essential resource that complements desalinated seawater. Therefore, ensuring the quality and contamination of groundwater has emerged as a critical priority for preserving water security. The aim of this research is to evaluate the groundwater quality and its vulnerability to contamination within the Wadi Marawani Basin. To achieve this aim, water quality indices (WQIs), the DRASTIC model, and machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed alongside a Geographic Information System (GIS). The results of the chemical analysis of 64 water samples were used in these assessments. Furthermore, several input parameters were evaluated using the DRASTIC model to estimate the DRASTIC index (DI) and generate a groundwater vulnerability map. Three ML algorithms—specifically, a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), a Random Forest (RF), and a Decision Tree (DT)—were utilized to forecast WQIs such as the total dissolved solids (TDS) and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), in addition to the DRASTIC index (DI). The results revealed that around 36% of the samples were classified as fresh water (<1000 mg/L). The SAR ranged from 1.10 to 32.50, indicating that most samples were suitable for irrigation. Approximately 22% of the basin was classified as demonstrating high vulnerability, whereas about 78% demonstrated low-to-moderate vulnerability. Assessment of the ML models showed high predictive accuracy for the TDS, SAR, and DI. The MLP-Vul. model attained an R2 value of 1.00 and RMSE value of 0.01, the RF-Vul. model achieved an R2 of 0.94 and RMSE of 3.17, and the DT-Vul. model attained an R2 of 0.92 and RMSE of 3.57. Although there was a minor increase in RMSE across all models during the testing phase, their predictive performance remained clear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: