This randomized trial assesses urban mobility profiles in Malaysian cities, suggesting sustainable transport improvements.
Urban mobility assessment requires evidence on congestion, travel time, speed loss, temporal variability, and peak imbalance. However, many city comparisons still rely on a single congestion ranking, which can obscure realised travel-time burden and road-network context. This study proposes a multidimensional diagnostic framework for seven Malaysian cities by integrating TomTom floating-car-data benchmarks, OpenStreetMap road-network indicators, and contextual population–vehicle background proxies. The framework applies data checking, unit harmonisation, direction adjustment, z-score standardisation, sensitivity analysis, and Ward hierarchical clustering. The results identify three exploratory profiles: high-congestion and long-travel-time cities, a city with high state-level vehicle-background context and strong peak asymmetry, and mixed lower-overall-pressure cities. Given the small sample, these profiles are interpreted as exploratory diagnostic patterns rather than stable city classifications. The framework supports sustainable mobility screening in data-scarce urban contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: