Shows lower diabetes complications in older adults, suggesting remote education is beneficial.
Introduction and Objective: Older adults on insulin have high risk of diabetes and cardiovascular (CVD) complications, yet the health economic value of geriatric-tailored continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) education is poorly characterized. We projected 10-year clinical outcomes, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) associated with REST study-informed A1c improvement. Methods: The REST study enrolled adults ≥65 years on insulin (type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D)) and either CGM naive or CGM users not meeting glycemic targets (TIR <40% and/or hypoglycemia >4%). The intervention combined remote CGM education with geriatric principles, including individualized glycemic goals and insulin regimen simplification based on CGM patterns. We used the CDC/RTI discrete-time diabetes microsimulation model (risk-equation-based projections of complications, costs, and QALYs), using the data from REST, and compared a REST-informed scenario vs usual care by applying an adjusted mean A1c reduction of 0.49% over 6 months. Simulations were run separately for T1D and T2D. Ten-year outcomes included total medical costs, QALYs, mortality, and diabetes/CVD complications. Results: Over 10 years (mean modeled follow-up 7.5 years), the model projected lower complication risk and mortality in REST vs. usual care. For T1D, projected reductions included MACE −2.54%, ESRD −6.53%, proliferative diabetic retinopathy −17.4%, amputation −12.8%, and mortality −2.85%. For T2D, projected reductions included stroke −2.52%, MI −2.76%, revascularization −2.83%, dialysis −5.01%, and mortality −2.17%. QALYs increased by +0.075 in T1D and +0.040 in T2D, with small increases in modeled medical costs (+$87 and +$71). With a $1,000 program cost assumption, implied cost per QALY was $14,493 for T1D and $26,775 for T2D. Conclusion: REST-informed projections indicate lower diabetes/CVD complications and better quality-adjusted survival over 10 years, with minimal added cost, supporting this scalable remote education for older adults on insulin. Disclosure A. Adam: None. S. Neuwahl: Other - Working on a project for this client as part of my normal duties as a health economist at my employer (RTI international).; Current; Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi. C. Slyne: None. M. Savory: None. N. Krakoff: None. J. Bulger: None. H. Brabant: None. Z. Tayebali: None. R. Weinstock: Research Support; Current; Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, JDRF, Diasome, DEKA Research and Development, Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. Research Support; Ended; Kowa Research Institute, Inc. Research Support; Current; National Institutes of Health. Research Support; Ended; Insulet Corporation. Research Support; Current; T1D Exchange. M. Munshi: Advisory Panel; Current; Abbott Diabetes. Research Support; Ended; Dexcom, Inc. E. Toschi: Consultant; Current; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated. Advisory Panel; Current; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated. Funding Funded provided by The Leona M. and Harry B.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: