Study estimates condition-specific healthcare expenditures in adults with knee and shoulder injuries, indicating significant cost differences.
Introduction: Musculoskeletal conditions impose a substantial economic burden on the United States (U.S.) healthcare system, but contemporary national estimates of condition-specific spending for common orthopaedic conditions remain limited. This study utilized the 2023 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) to estimate the national prevalence, condition-specific expenditures, and payer distribution for treated knee injuries and shoulder disorders. Methods: Adults with treated knee injuries or shoulder disorders were identified using ICD-10-CM codes from the MEPS Medical Conditions File. Condition-specific expenditures were estimated by linking diagnoses to medical events and payments using the MEPS Condition–Event Link File. Expenditures were aggregated across inpatient, outpatient, office-based, emergency, home health, and prescribed medicine categories. Survey-weighted analyses were used to estimate national prevalence, mean expenditures, service-level spending patterns, and payer distributions. Survey-weighted Gamma generalized linear models with log link were used to examine patient characteristics associated with expenditures among the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population with positive condition-specific spending. Results: The analysis identified 2.55 million adults with treated knee injuries and 2.58 million adults with treated shoulder disorders. Mean annual condition-specific expenditures per person were higher for knee injuries ($10,552; 95% CI: $6128–$14,975) than for shoulder disorders ($4310; 95% CI: $3337–$5283). Knee injury expenditures were concentrated in inpatient and home health care, whereas shoulder disorder expenditures were concentrated in outpatient and office-based care. Private insurance, Medicare, out-of-pocket payments, and Worker’s Compensation each contributed to the financial burden, with payer distributions varying by condition. In adjusted models, fair/poor self-rated health and female sex were associated with higher knee injury expenditures, while no covariates were statistically significant for shoulder disorder expenditures. Conclusions: Treated knee injuries and shoulder disorders showed distinct condition-specific expenditure profiles across care settings and payer sources. These findings provide contemporary national benchmarks for orthopaedic spending and may support future research, utilization monitoring, and value-based reimbursement planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: