Cross-sectional survey assesses awareness and perceived understanding of diabetes self-management education among healthcare professionals, suggesting gaps in knowledge.
Introduction and Objective: Despite the proven benefits of DSMES, its utilization remains suboptimal. We aimed to assess the awareness and perceived understanding of DSMES among the ADA members. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was disseminated to Chairs of ADA’s 16 interest groups (IG) with a one-time request to distribute it to their respective IG members. All ADA members were included; incomplete surveys were excluded. The voluntary, anonymous 6-minute survey, developed by the ADA DSMES IG Leadership Team, comprised 25 open-ended and Likert-scale items (0=strongly disagree to 4= strongly agree), assessing awareness and perceived understanding of DSMES objectives, core activities, referral criteria, general benefits, and billing processes. Results: Over the course of 3 months, 61 (75.3%) provided complete data. Participants were predominantly white and female (72%), with 68.9% providing direct patient care; 19.7% reported prior DSMES involvement. The most common degrees were MD (29.5%) and RN (27.9%). Mean DSMES awareness was 2.97± 0.76 (0-4 scale), with perceived understanding of 61±29%. Mean confidence was 2.81±0.85 and modestly correlated with perceived understanding (r=0.46, p <0.001). Conclusion: While DSMES awareness was generally high, notable discrepancies between confidence and actual understanding underscore the need for strengthened DSMES education among healthcare professionals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LEE et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: