Cross-sectional study evaluates the prescription patterns of fixed-dose combination drugs for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in various specialties, indicating usage trends and preferences.
Introduction and Objective: Fixed dose combination (FDC) of empagliflozin sitagliptin and metformin recently approved in India and there were limited data on its utilization pattern. This study evaluates demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and prescription patterns of triple FDC prescribed for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients by healthcare specialists in outpatient setting. Methods: Cross-sectional, observational, real-world study approved by ethics committee. Data of T2DM patients prescribed on triple FDC from 312 centers across India were collected. Specialties like Physician, Diabetologist, Endocrinologist, Cardiologist & Nephrologist recorded patients’ data in eCRF. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and between-group comparisons with ANOVA and t-tests. Results: A total of 2290 patients with T2DM (mean age 54.22 ± 11.4 years; 58.29% male) using triple FDC were analyzed. Physician (44.37 %), Diabetologist (38.52%) were primary prescriber of FDC followed by Endocrinologist (8.08%), Cardiologist (8.08%), & Nephrologist 0.96 %. The most frequent dose was Empagliflozin 25 + Sitagliptin 100 + Metformin 1000 (52.75%), followed by Empagliflozin 10 + Sitagliptin 100 + Metformin 1000 (47.25%). Cardiologists showed preference for 10 mg based FDC (n=142) over 25 mg (n= 43) however endocrinologist and nephrologist preferred 25 mg based FDC. Hypertension (n= 208; 9.8%) and cardiovascular diseases (n= 198, 8.6%) were the leading comorbidities. In patients with history of coronary artery disease 25 mg based FDC was preferred (88 vs 47) whereas in heart failure patients 10 mg based FDC preferred (11 vs 7). Conclusion: In Indian outpatient practice, empagliflozin sitagliptin metformin FDC utilized by across specialties. Dosage selection appears to be influenced by specific medical specialty and nature of patient’s cardiovascular comorbidities. Disclosure P. Mate: Employee; Current; Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. G. Chavan: Employee; Current; Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mate et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: