Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This thesis investigates non-humanist perspectives on resistance in 1970s political writings, suggesting implications for contemporary thought.
This thesis investigates a non-humanist reading of Frantz Fanon’s work and applies it to the political subjectivity in the works of Steve Biko and George Jackson as significant anti-colonial and anti-imperialist resistors and writers in the 1970s, when Frantz Fanon was becoming increasingly influential. While Fanon is often characterized as a revolutionary humanist, his core diagnosis of colonialism as a system of ontological negation and social death challenges the very possibilities of humanist reconciliation. In this study, I argue that a non-humanist Fanonian framework more faithfully captures the experiences of revolutionaries and political prisoners who operate in direct conflict with the bounds of liberal recognition. Through a phenomenological analysis of the selected works of I Write What I Like (Biko, 1978) and Soledad Brother: The Prison Letters of George Jackson (Jackson, 1970), I trace how both writers confront or reject humanist concepts of progress, universalism, and solidarity. Outcomes of my analysis include shared themes of resistance that are defined by a rupture with humanist thought, teleology, and assimilationist politics, with variances across the selected works in the aspects of Fanon’s tradition that they draw on.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadie Steelman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: