Key result
Type 1 and type 2 diabetes show similar elevated NT-proBNP rates, but higher frequency in women.
Why the study?
Comparative data on NT-proBNP patterns between type 1 and type 2 diabetes, particularly regarding sex-specific differences, remain limited.
Are there sex and diabetes-type differences in the prevalence of elevated NT-proBNP indicating subclinical HFpEF in patients with stable diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=80)
Are there sex and diabetes-type differences in the prevalence of elevated NT-proBNP indicating subclinical HFpEF in patients with stable diabetes?
NT-proBNP is frequently elevated in stable diabetes patients without overt heart failure, particularly in T1DM and women, suggesting a high burden of subclinical HFpEF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NT-proBNP elevation in stable diabetes without overt HF should not yet change practice; hypothesis-generating for sex- and type-specific subclinical HFpEF burden.
Introduction and Objective: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a major cardiometabolic complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), often remaining subclinical. Natriuretic peptides, particularly NT-proBNP, serve as early biomarkers of myocardial dysfunction. However, comparative data on NT-proBNP patterns between type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM), especially regarding sex-specific differences, remain limited. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 80 hospitalized patients with stable diabetes (23 T1DM, 57 T2DM). Serum NT-proBNP was measured, with levels >125 pg/mL considered elevated per ESC criteria. Group differences in NT-proBNP prevalence were assessed using Pearson’s χ² test, with additional sex-specific analysis. Results: Elevated NT-proBNP (>125 pg/mL) was detected in all patients with T1DM (100%) and in 81% of those with T2DM, showing a strong trend toward higher prevalence in T1DM (χ² = 3.65, p > 0.05). Mean NT-proBNP levels exceeded diagnostic thresholds in both groups, with all T1DM patients above the cut-off, while a subset of T2DM patients remained below it, indicating heterogeneity of subclinical cardiac involvement. Significant sex differences were observed: women predominated in the T1DM group (79%), while women comprised 47% of the T2DM group, and elevated NT-proBNP was more frequent in women, whereas men were overrepresented among T2DM patients with normal values (χ² = 6.13, p < 0.05). No patients had clinically overt heart failure, consistent with subclinical HFpEF-like dysfunction. Conclusion: NT-proBNP is frequently elevated in both T1DM and T2DM in the absence of overt heart failure, indicating a substantial burden of subclinical HFpEF. T1DM shows a particularly high prevalence of NT-proBNP elevation, while women demonstrate more pronounced NT-proBNP increases across diabetes types, underscoring the importance of sex-specific interpretation. Incorporating NT-proBNP into cardiometabolic screening with attention to female sex may enhance early HFpEF risk stratification in diabetes. Disclosure A. Sokolova: None.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A.M. Sokolova (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Stable diabetes (Type 1 and Type 2) (n=80). Type 1 diabetes vs. Type 2 diabetes was evaluated on Elevated NT-proBNP (>125 pg/mL) (p=> 0.05). Elevated NT-proBNP (>125 pg/mL) was present in 100% of patients with type 1 diabetes compared to 81% with type 2 diabetes (p>0.05), with a significantly higher frequency in women (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: