Examines how bedding fractures influence permeability in shale oil cores, suggesting improved evaluation methods.
Bedding fractures strongly influence pore structure and anisotropic flow capacity in laminated shale oil reservoirs, but conventional porosity–permeability relationships cannot adequately explain permeability differences caused by bedding orientation and fracture connectivity. This problem represents an important gap in shale oil reservoir evaluation because cores with similar porosity may exhibit markedly different permeability when bedding-fracture connectivity and flow direction differ. The main question addressed in this study is how bedding-fracture structures in paired horizontal and vertical LGS shale oil cores selected from the same depth intervals influence porosity, permeability, and permeability anisotropy. To answer this question, this study establishes a quantitative framework linking X-ray computed tomography-derived bedding-fracture structure, three-dimensional fractal dimension, and stress-sensitive permeability anisotropy in LGS shale oil cores. Paired horizontal and vertical cores from the same depth intervals were tested under confining pressures of 10–50 MPa. X-ray computed tomography reconstruction was used to extract bedding-fracture volume fraction Vf, fracture number Nb, fracture density ρb, connectivity index Cb, and three-dimensional box-counting fractal dimension D3. The H-series cores exhibit much higher bedding-parallel permeability than the V-series cores, although their porosity ranges partly overlap. At 10 MPa, the average permeability of the H-series is 0.24402 mD, approximately 21.7 times that of the V-series 0.01127 mD. As confining pressure increases from 10 to 50 MPa, the average permeability decreases by approximately 97.1% for the H-series and 96.5% for the V-series, indicating strong stress sensitivity of bedding-fracture-controlled flow channels. The D3 values range from 2.16 to 2.63 for the H-series and from 2.12 to 2.56 for the V-series. Higher D3, Vf, and Cb enhance permeability when bedding fractures are aligned with the flow direction, whereas complex but discontinuous bedding structures may still result in low bedding-normal permeability. A fractal-corrected porosity–permeability model incorporating φ, Vf, Cb, and D3 is proposed to improve permeability interpretation beyond porosity alone. This study demonstrates that permeability anisotropy in LGS shale oil cores is controlled by the combined effects of pore–fracture volume, directional connectivity, fractal complexity, and stress-induced fracture closure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: