This research paper examines how Islamic/Sharia-based political and economic thinking can offer viable solutions to contemporary global challenges, including economic inequality, unethical financial practices, and governance failures. Grounded in principles of social justice, equality, mutual accountability, and public welfare (adl and shura), the study argues that traditional Islamic frameworks provide a coherent, value-driven alternative to purely material, profit-centric conventional models. The paper systematically addresses key modern crises and counters major contemporary critiques. It outlines how the institutional circulation of wealth via zakat and the structural prohibition of riba (interest) foster financial stability and equity. Furthermore, it addresses criticisms regarding modernity, global market integration, and individual freedoms by highlighting the intrinsic jurisprudential flexibility (Maqasid\ al-Sharia) and participatory governance mechanisms embedded in Sunni Islamic thought. The work concludes that by seamlessly integrating moral governance with economic justice, Sharia offers a highly adaptable, normative framework that prioritizes holistic human welfare and social harmony.
Taj et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: