Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study cross-checks outcomes of eROSITA-DE DR1 catalogue and cosmology subsample, indicating robustness of selection-function.
Cross-check of the NT30 Route 3 result using the eROSITA-DE DR1 primary catalogue (N=10,074, z∈[0.1,0.8]) vs the cosmology subsample (N=5,259). The primary and cosmology-selected catalogues yield statistically indistinguishable values of I (−0.06σ) and eI (0.1367 vs 0.1368), while both remain separated from the forward-modelled ΛCDM baseline (+6.0σ and +7.5σ respectively within the pipeline). Selection-function robustness is supported within the CIC/FFT pipeline. Claim 7 remains Advanced pending window-function deconvolution and full mock validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
José Luis Vázquez González (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: