Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper uses closed-form and copula models to analyze short-term and medium-term financial instruments' hedging effectiveness and tail risk reduction in long-term renewable Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). Using monthly and yearly exchange-traded electricity futures, we study PPA contracts from California, Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. The overall low or negative hedging effectiveness and inconsistent tail risk reductions indicate that traditional linear hedging strategies may not consistently achieve the desired risk mitigation. Monthly contracts are generally more effective in California, Germany, and France, while yearly contracts are preferable in Italy and Spain, highlighting the need for market-specific hedging strategies. • Analyzes hedging effectiveness and tail risk in long-term renewable PPAs. • Studies PPA contracts from California, Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. • Finds overall low/negative hedging effectiveness and inconsistent tail risk reductions. • Monthly contracts better in CA, Germany, France; yearly preferred in Italy and Spain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peña et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: