This paper builds on the idea that enactment is a form of narration in action. Drawing on Scarfone's concept of the "unpast" I describe mutual enactment as an "untelling" that narrates that which has been locked in endless repetition. The untelling is also an un-telling, an undoing of prior translations, a "dissolution" of ways of being and an attempt to find the breakdown that is always feared. Following Laplanche, I distinguish between "filled-in enactment," available to be understood and known, and "hollowed-out enactment" that opens a world of the unknowable, archaic sexual, within analyst and patient. Only when the hollow of the patient meets the hollow of the analyst can the work of re-translation and the instantiation of time and the past take hold. I offer a detailed description of my work with a patient to illustrate these different modes of enactment and the construction of the past and subjectivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert Grossmark (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Psychoanalytic Dialogues