Why the study?
Physical effort prospectively discounts reward value but retrospectively increases it (the effort paradox), prompting this investigation into neural dynamics and potential moderators during reward evaluation.
The study reveals a dynamic neural balance between effort discounting and enhancement during reward evaluation, which is modulated by perceived control.
Does not support immediate changes in motivational care; extends neural models of effort-reward but remains hypothesis-generating.
Effort expenditure not only prospectively discounts the reward associated with it but also retrospectively adds the subjective value of reward, which is known as the effort paradox. This study aimed to resolve the effort paradox during reward evaluation through the critical lens of neural dynamics and its potential moderators. In total, 40 participants completed an effort-reward task wherein they exerted varying physical efforts to obtain an opportunity to win monetary rewards by active or passive decision-making. We found that after-effects of physical effort expenditure during reward evaluation unfolded as an effort paradox over time, manifesting itself as an effort discounting effect during the reward positivity (RewP) period but as an effort enhancement effect during the late positive potential (LPP) interval. Then, we found a dynamic balance between the discounting effect and the enhancement effect such that the more effort discounted the RewP at the early stage, the more effort increased the LPP at the late stage. Moreover, we observed that the effort-reward relationship was modulated by perceived control such that it increased the reward sensitivity effect and decreased the effort discounting effect. Together, our findings provide new insights into the neural mechanisms underlying the after-effects of physical effort exertion during reward evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: