Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines Hainan’s tourism strategy in the South China Sea, highlighting its geopolitical implications.
This article examines how China’s South China Sea (SCS) tourism was formed, enacted and recalibrated over time. Drawing on multi-decade data, we show that SCS tourism was more than a top-down territorialisation strategy but also a socio-economic enterprise, reflecting both Beijing’s evolving foreign-policy calculations and the uneven weight of bureaucratic concerns and local lobbying. The Hainan government acted as a policy entrepreneur in advancing Paracel tourism and pursued a tourism hedging strategy. This research contributes to tourism geopolitics studies by bringing a multi-scalar, processual perspective and to SCS studies by offering a domestic political explanation of China’s maritime statecraft.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: