Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study demonstrates serum biomarkers predict mortality in dogs, suggesting clinical relevance for prognosis.
Objective: To determine whether serum biomarkers, BUN-to-albumin ratio (BAR) and creatinine-to-albumin ratio (CAR), have prognostic utility in dogs. Methods: A retrospective, single-center study utilizing signalment, clinicopathological, and mortality data collected from medical records of dogs presented to a referral hospital from September 2022 through June 2025. Dogs were stratified based on mortality. Results: 327 cases were included. Nonsurvivors (n = 92) had significantly elevated BAR (median, 6.62; 95% CI, 5.69 to 7.61) and CAR (0.36; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.42) compared with survivors at 5.01 (95% CI, 4.52 to 5.50) and 0.29 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.31), respectively. Nonsurvivors had lower albumin (2.9 g/dL; 95% CI, 2.7 to 3.0) than survivors (3.2 g/dL; 95% CI, 3.1 to 3.2). Blood urea nitrogen was higher in nonsurvivors (18.8 mg/dL; 95% CI, 17.1 to 23.2) than survivors (16.0 mg/dL; 95% CI, 14.8 to 17.4). Survival analysis identified low albumin as the strongest predictor of mortality, with increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 2.01; CI, 1.32 to 3.07). High BAR, BUN, and CAR were associated with poor survival, whereas creatinine was not related to outcome. A random forest-classified model showed strong discrimination between survivors and nonsurvivors, with an area under the curve of 0.998 (Specificity, 100%; Sensitivity, 71.7%). Conclusions: Nonsurvivors had significantly higher BAR, CAR, BUN, and creatinine and lower albumin; BAR, CAR, BUN, and albumin outperformed creatinine in predicting mortality. Clinical Relevance: Biochemical ratios are easily calculated, have the potential to predict mortality in dogs, and thus warrant further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pullens et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: