Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals enhanced accuracy in brain tumor classification using a novel CNN approach, suggesting significant diagnostic improvements.
Brain tumors are a major clinical threat and are associated with high mortality, making accurate and timely diagnosis from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) essential for treatment planning. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have improved automated MRI analysis. However, many existing models remain computationally expensive and do not fully exploit efficient multiscale feature fusion because they rely on predominantly single-branch, sequential feature extraction. Here, we propose HayabusaNet, a compact CNN that uses depthwise separable convolutions to improve efficiency while preserving discriminative capacity. The network employs parallel multiscale branches with varied kernel sizes and progressively increased channel widths to capture fine-grained and coarse tumor patterns. We introduce a tailored multiscale feature-fusion scheme to integrate branch outputs, and we incorporate a hybrid attention module to enhance salient local cues while injecting global contextual dependencies. HayabusaNet is evaluated on two public benchmarks: the multiclass Kaggle Brain Tumor MRI dataset (7,023 images) and the binary Br35H dataset (3,000 images). Model explanations are examined using Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) and Grad-CAM++. On the Kaggle dataset, HayabusaNet achieves 98.86% accuracy, 98.84% precision, 98.78% recall, and a 98.81% F1-score. On Br35H, it attains 98.70% for accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Compared with other deep CNNs, the proposed model improves computational efficiency through fewer parameters, lower FLOPs, and faster inference, while maintaining strong classification performance. In conclusion, these results show that combining multiscale feature fusion, efficient convolutions, and hybrid attention can improve the accuracy–efficiency balance for brain MRI classification. The framework also supports interpretation through saliency visualizations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prayogo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: